The Top Ad Tech News of 2017
Ad tech makes the world go round.
It controls what we buy. It can create media jobs or spark layoffs. It knows more about us than we do. And sometimes, it has the power to influence elections.
To cap off the year, we analyzed 2017’s most important ad tech news. From HyphBot to Amazon, here are the top trends and their impact on ad tech.
Jump to Sections
- Advertisers call for transparency
- The need for brand safety
- Domain spoofing rises
- Browsers add blockers and privacy
- Amazon enters the market
- The People v. Ad Tech
- Pivot to video
- Advertising acquisitions
- Alternative revenue models
- Predictions for 2018
Advertisers call for platform transparency
In late January, Marc Pritchard took the stage at the IAB’s annual leadership meeting and set the ad tech industry on fire.
In his scathing speech, he told digital advertising it was time to grow up and that P&G would no longer advertise with any companies that didn’t follow MRC’s viewability and verification rules.
It was surprising how quickly his words shifted power from platforms to advertisers. Stemming from this speech, we can attribute:
- Chase removing its ads from 395,000 websites without impacting results.
- P&G cutting its digital spend by $100 million and seeing no impact.
- The Guardian suing Rubicon Project for not disclosing fees.
- CEO of The New York Times calling digital advertising a “nightmarish joke” at Cannes.
- Google agreeing to issue refunds to advertisers for fake traffic.
- Adobe announcing it would help advertisers find hidden fees from ad tech companies.
Thanks to Marc Pritchard, advertisers won a few battles in 2017. In fact, he claims 80% of the cleanup is complete, with MRC capacity holding back accreditation requirements.
The need for brand safety
But the war to clean up ad tech is only beginning. If this year was about platform transparency, next year will be about placement transparency.
Automated placements and low-quality news sites spurred brand safety concerns in 2016. This continued into 2017 as 72% marketers feared their ads would show up next to problematic content.
YouTube became the poster platform for these concerns. In March, Verizon, AT&T and Johnson & Johnson pulled advertising from the service after ads appeared alongside terrorist propaganda. Months later, people raised questions about pre-roll ads on potential child exploitation videos. In a Buzzfeed article, an Allstate ad appears on one of these channels.
So, how did brands mitigate threats in 2017? Eric Franchi recommended a three step approach:
- Make whitelists, not blacklists. The former has proven ineffective for brand safety due to the complicated ad tech supply chain.
- Use third-party verification technology to see where your ads actually run.
- Get vendors to sign contracts to adhere to white lists.
But even with the right planning, open exchanges and automated placements will always come with a degree of risk.
Domain spoofing rises
Domain spoofing is a giant game of whack-a-mole, except the moles get smarter every time you whack’em. Here’s a sampling of the year’s domain spoofing fraud:
- HyphBot was found to be netting $1.2 million a day from fake inventory.
- A bot on major sports sites is costing advertisers up to $250 million a year.
- The Financial Times found spoofed inventory on multiple ad networks including Oath, AppNexus, and PubMatic.
- Business Insider found 10 to 30 million phony impressions in a 15-minute test.
Two domain spoofing solutions gained popularity in 2017:
With ads.txt, publishers add a text file listing authorized ad sellers to their domain. Distributors and advertisers can use this file to verify inventory.
While ads.txt is a win for publishers and advertisers, this radical transparency has proven to be a bit much for many vendors. Human error is another big issue. Publishers misspelling authorized sellers or being tricked into adding a fraudulent agency or reseller are real concerns.
In the meantime, the IAB launched a working group to determine blockchain’s potential impact on advertising, and ad exchange AdEx is testing blockchain-based auctions.
Browsers add blockers and protect privacy
Browsers are our gateway to the internet, and also ad tech’s gateway to users. They know a lot about us, and that’s worth something in a world where data is more valuable than oil.
Apple took heat this year for implementing 24-hour time limits on third-party cookies in Safari. Advertising groups freaked, calling it a “unilateral and heavy-handed approach” to user privacy. Some think it will make Google and Facebook even more powerful.
Google Chrome also shared plans to block the worst ads from appearing—think pop ups, auto-play video ads with sound enabled, and “prestitial” ads. Google is calling its feature an ad filter, not an ad blocker for obvious PR reasons.
It’s not surprising that Google and Apple took different approaches to curbing the worst parts of ad tech. Google makes a lot of money from data, while Apple makes little money from ads.
Amazon enters the market
This year, Google and Facebook welcomed an unwanted third sibling into the family.
Jokes aside, Amazon positioned itself as a serious threat to the duopoly in 2017. Here’s why other advertising platforms should be nervous (taken from Issue 43 of Ad Tech Weekly):
- Amazon has tremendous scale. Some have even said it’s 2-3X that of Google.
- Amazon has the world’s largest walled garden.
- Amazon already has “content” that people are looking for today. They are basically a product search engine.
- Amazon doesn’t need media or publishing companies to create “content” for their platforms so they can reach critical mass.
- Amazon owns everyone’s purchasing history.
Many publishers have also opted for Amazon’s server-to-server wrapper—likely because they see Amazon as a balance to Google’s dominance.
Of course, some say Amazon sees advertising as a means to sell more products and not its raison d’être. But don’t act surprised when “oligarchy” replaces “duopoly” in 2018.
The People v. Ad Tech
Governments waded into ad tech this year with different approaches from each side of the Atlantic.
The EU is bracing for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to go into effect in May 2018. The regulation stops advertisers from using or collecting personal data without explicit permission, which has far-reaching implications for publishers, ad tech companies, and consumers. No one can agree whether this will hurt or help publishers, or even who’s to blame if data is collected illegally.
Most notably, Congress began peering into ad tech after finding Russian operatives ran 3,000 Facebook ads reaching 11.4 million Americans during the presidential election. Twitter and Google didn’t go unscathed in its investigations, either.
Pivot to video
2017 was the “pivot to video” for newsrooms, which means laying off writers in favor of production staff. Publishers that pivoted include Mic, MTV, Vice, Fox Sports, and Vocativ.
Pivoting to video is rarely done out of audience demand. Instead, publishers choose to create more video content in hopes of higher CPMs and the chance to earn money on third-party platforms such as Facebook Watch.
The strategy isn’t paying off. Bleacher Report has said CPMs on social videos are a fraction of what it earns on its own site. At the same time, publishers have seen a massive decline in pageviews as video makes them more reliant on platforms.
Perhaps the biggest sign of video’s letdown is Mashable, which some say was the first publisher to pivot to video. This year it sold for $50 million, well below its $250 million valuation.
Ad tech acquisitions took off in 2017 as companies shored up resources to compete against advertising giants. Notable acquisitions include:
- Airbnb acquiring AdBasis (TechCrunch)
- Oracle buying Moat for $850 million (Recode)
- Sizmek buying Rocket Fuel (AdExchanger)
- Rubicon Project acquiring nToggle (The Drum)
- Nielsen buying Visual IQ (Martech Today)
On the publisher side, Laurene Powell Jobs purchased a majority stake in The Atlantic. Silicon Valley’s interest in media isn’t new, but the acquisition sparked debate between the perks of fresh ownership and the danger of bosses without media backgrounds (coincidentally, this is from The Atlantic).
Alternative revenue models
It’s clear that ad tech wasn’t all sunshine in 2017. Open ad exchanges led to massive fraud, brands advertised on terrorism videos, and governments questioned the accessibility of buying ads.
Given this climate, some publishers explored new advertising revenue models.
Medium kicked off the year by removing native ads in favor of an ad-free business model (spoiler: this led to paid membership with a micropayment pool for writers).
But publishers hosted on Medium weren’t impressed by the loss of ad revenue: Pacific Standard, Film School Rejects, Backchannel, The Awl, and many others went back to owned properties in 2017.
“The move to Medium was a cool experiment, in my opinion, but the year is up and personally I missed the ads.” – Silvia Killingsworth, The Awl
Apple News and Facebook also created new ways for publishers to make money on their platforms. Apple planned to let media partners fill their own ad space in Apple News, while Facebook tested paywalls and subscriptions in Instant Articles.
Predictions for 2018
- In an attempt to clean up its feed, Facebook de-emphasizes real news even more. Publisher referral traffic shrinks drastically.
- Publishers that grow the quickest will be companies that both embraces paid subscription models and figured out an elegant way to also integrate advertisements in a user-friendly way. Diversifying revenue streams is the key to future growth.
- Data blocking and privacy technologies find a way into OSes like OS X, Windows, and ChromeOS. Okay. Maybe not the last one.
- Net neutrality, despite its consumer-level problems, is a huge financial boon for advertising technology companies and established publishers.